I uploaded that image from my Blogabet account, since the match wasn\'t showing up on the clone site. Thanks.

Molcan has a higher ceiling and much more experience at the highest level (reaching a career-high ranking of No. 38), and in a Challenger R1 tournament, that\'s crucial if he\'s focused.
Although Added is more accustomed to indoor courts, Molcan\'s left-handed game can disrupt rallies with wide serves and sudden changes of direction, which are very difficult to play on indoor courts. The odds compensate us for the risk on indoor courts.
This line should be closer to 2.00-2.10.

Moro is a much stronger returner and consistently punishes weak second serves, which is exactly Rocha’s main weakness.
In 2025 they have played three times against each other, and our guy won all three matches.
Under indoor conditions and at a similar average performance level, Moro wins this matchup more often than he loses, and the 2.12 odds clearly give us an edge.

Hey everyone!
Let\'s see what you think of my new movie XD

The market considers her a slightly less favored player, but based on her ranking, titles, WTA experience, and overall potential, Joint shouldn\'t be below 50%.
The market clearly tends to overvalue teenage players in the early rounds.

Personally, I see it as more of a 50/50 match, and I\'d even say Joint is the favorite.

Valentova is playing at home, and in the first round, that could even create some pressure. I really think this price of 2.20 will drop between now and match day.

I\'m setting a stake of 1 because I don\'t see Joint as having an overwhelming advantage, but the 2.20 doesn\'t make sense.

Let\'s go for it!

Hello everyone 🙂

This is a clear opening odds error. Anna is superior in every way. Hard courts are her best, and she\'s ranked 33rd to Kartal\'s 63rd. She\'s aggressive yet disciplined, has good tactical awareness, and is solid against the rest of the team.

Clear favorite: Kalinskaya. Kartal is competitive, but she needs our teammate to have an bad day.

Dellien has won both matches. Hugo is currently ranked 137th, compared to Almeida\'s 295th. Our player has much more experience, especially on clay, where he has historically had a higher winning percentage.

Almeida has less experience overall and tends to be more inconsistent, particularly against solid clay-court players. I estimate our player\'s chances of winning to be around 65%, and I think that\'s a good price to pay for our popcorn and a movie night.

Joao is almost 100 places higher in the ranking and shows much greater consistency.
They did play once before and Nikolas won, but that match was back in 2020, at ITF level, in a completely different context compared to today.

Since then, Joao has won several titles, while Nikolas hasn’t won any.
Joao has also competed in Grand Slam events, which gives him better pressure management and experience at a higher level.

On top of that, Joao has better results on clay than Nikolas, and overall, the story has changed a lot since 2020.

Basically, we’re entering because of the odds movement. At the opening, the value was on Stefan, but so much money has come in that the value has shifted to Kuku. It makes no sense to have this at 1.80 — they’ve pushed the odds up from 1.50 to 1.80. The fair odds should be around 1.65 at most, so we have some margin there to generate value for our bankroll.

I\'m placing another stake of 1 because they\'re losing their minds. I don\'t see that much difference between these two at all; like I said, I even see her as a slight favorite. She could lose, of course... but don\'t put her at 3.10 because you\'ll make me buy in again.

Wiskandt is almost 800 spots higher in the ranking, with much more experience and better performance on hard courts.
Boogaard is only 17 years old and is behind in everything — fewer aces, lower first-serve %, fewer service breaks, and even 200 fewer matches played than Wiskandt.

In my opinion, this is a clear opportunity to go catch some Pokémon with these odds.

Hello my ladies, Kukushkin is coming in strong, winning everything 2-0, but our teammate already beat him in October in France, hasn\'t lost a single match in the last 10, is almost 15 years younger, has already won two titles in 2025, and won another this year, while Kukushkin hasn\'t won any since 2024.

It\'s a final, and as we know, anything can happen in finals, but at 2.25 odds, it doesn\'t make much sense. In my opinion, our teammate is a slight favorite. I think bet365 is mistaken with these odds.

How are you, dear friends? Everyone\'s supporting Murkel, but in my opinion, Agamenone has a better chance of winning, around 60%. Murkel barely scraped through to the semi-finals, winning all their matches 2-1 and struggling, while Franco cruised through like a Marquis. I see him as much more consistent, and his first serve is stronger than Dellien\'s. So I think the real value lies here.

Hi 🙂 Here\'s another movie recommendation for the wee hours of the morning.

Mboko is the clear favorite, especially given her performance on hard courts and her dominance in their only previous encounter. Her percentages reflect better form compared to Kalinskaya.

Her form in 2025, higher ranking, and direct match against Kalinskaya on hard courts put her in a stronger position to advance.

Solid and aggressive serve, especially on key points. Powerful baseline game, with flat shots that pressure and dominate. Winning mentality after notable victories in 2025. Hard court adaptation: Very good, with better percentages and performance than Kalinskaya on this surface.

Hey guys, what\'s up? I won\'t go on too long, it\'s a 50/50 match. Besides, if it goes on too long, Kukushkin is almost 40 and he\'s going to feel it.

Bertola is almost 50 places higher in the rankings and has been playing well in recent matches.

There\'s money to be made here, whether the bet is successful or not, we know how this works, but there\'s money to be made here, at this price, we have to play as if we were using the Nintendo 64.

Hi 🙂 Pedro is 200 places ahead in the ranking, they have played 2 full matches, Pedro has won both, this odds are due to Juan coming from winning all the matches, but all the matches have been against my father, let\'s see how he does this one since my father is on vacation. He\'s playing at home and Juan might be more motivated, but let\'s face it, the difference in level between the two is clear.

Joint is one of the young players with the strongest upward progression on the tour and already has solid experience at top-level tournaments. Kenin has been world No. 4 and is a Grand Slam champion (Australian Open 2020), but her recent form has been somewhat inconsistent. The head-to-head record stands at 2–0 in favor of Maya Joint, with both previous meetings played on hard courts and both won by Joint with identical 6–3, 6–1 scorelines. From a tactical perspective, Joint holds a clear advantage from the baseline, showing better first-serve effectiveness and superior break-point conversion in their direct encounters. She also commits fewer double faults and applies constant pressure on her opponent’s second serve, which has been a key factor in her dominance in this matchup.

I\'ll tell you my perspective and see what you think. Lucia is much better than Stoiana, but why these odds? Because Lucia has been playing her last few matches from home on her PS5. Stoiana is basically an ITF player. Is she good? Yes, but she\'s at a much lower level, and Lucia needs to take advantage of that.

So, we\'re using her recent losses to grab these great odds at our beloved Pinnacle

Hi everyone, I\'d like to explain my thoughts. Yasu has beaten Wu in their last 3 matches., is over 70 places higher in the rankings, and in my opinion, he\'s the favorite in tennis right now.

I think the odds don\'t reflect this, which is why I\'m backing him.

I don\\\'t understand these odds for this match at all. He\\\'s almost 600 points ahead in the rankings, they played in the Rome 2 Challenger and Gaubas easily beat him 2-0. I\\\'d stake more, but since I don\\\'t know if there\\\'s any information or data I\\\'ve overlooked, let\\\'s go with these two picks at a normal stake.

I don\'t understand these odds for this match at all. He\'s almost 600 points ahead in the rankings, they played in the Rome 2 Challenger and Gaubas easily beat him 2-0. I\'d stake more, but since I don\'t know if there\'s any information or data I\'ve overlooked, let\'s go with these two picks at a normal stake.

ATP ranking: Llamas is ranked 211 while Bernet is 510, so there is a clear gap.

Over the long term, Llamas is the better player overall. He is much more used to playing under pressure and handling tough moments in matches. His level of experience on the professional tour is significantly higher than Bernet’s.

On hard courts, Llamas has historically been more consistent. He also performs better in key moments, with stronger numbers on first-serve points won, sets won and general match control.

Conclusion: Pablo Llamas Ruiz is the clear statistical and market favorite. The match may have some tight moments, but his advantage in experience and consistency should make the difference.

Sonego — Experience, strong break-point defense, and a more stable career track record.
He is also performing better this year in terms of win percentage.

Sonego rank: #39
Shang rank: #255

I’m placing stake 1 because I’m playing this purely based on line movement value, but I believe this is a spot that can be profitable in the long run

Timofey Skatov (Kazakhstan) comes into this match with a higher ATP ranking and better current form.
Head-to-head: July 5, 2024 – Skatov defeated Forejtek 6-3, 6-3 at the Troyes Challenger.

This price has value and is likely to shorten between now and match time, so taking it early provides a clear advantage.

McCabe leads the head-to-head 1–0. (McCabe win 4-6, 6-3, 7-6, 7-6) Wimbledon 2025

McCabe tends to hit many aces and win quick points on serve.

Barrios Vera produces fewer aces and fewer free points.

At this moment, I see McCabe as the favorite

Everyone\'s backing Liam, but there are several factors: Gea starts very strong. Percentage of first sets won (on hard courts): Gea: 75% Draxl: 62% Here, Gea has a structural advantage. Draxl doesn\'t have a very reliable second serve. Gea punishes second serves a lot. On hard courts, every break usually comes from the second serve. Yes, Draxl is ranked higher. But be aware: Draxl has accumulated a lot of points indoors/university/on slower courts. Gea is on the rise, with better recent numbers on outdoor hard courts

Not much to say, Mayot leads 2-0 in the previous match, which went to 6-2, 6-2.

Better form, better rhythm, better streak.

Sumit ranks #275 against Harold\'s #167.

I\'m not going to spend much, but it\'s more of the same: poorly placed odds that are just going to keep dropping.

These odds for this match make no sense. Whether it happens or not, we all know how this works, but there\'s money to be made here.

Cedrik-Marcel Stebe: 35 years Ranking #347 |||||||| Max Houkes: 25 years Ranking #247 (Service and play from the back are somewhat better in some aspects)

Carballés Baena is higher ranked overall (#129) and has significantly more experience in ATP and Challenger-level tournaments.

Smith is younger and still in the process of building competitive rhythm at this level.

Carballés Baena has a proven track record in long matches and tends to perform well in high-pressure situations.

Smith, with less experience, can show high peaks in performance but also the typical inconsistencies of younger players.

Bax has shown better performance in his last 10 matches.

Chung has alternated between wins and losses, and his recent form has not been very stable.

Bax is three years younger and currently holds a higher ATP ranking.

Recent form:

Chung: Irregular / average

Bax: More consistent

Nick Kyrgios has had very little competitive activity in recent years due to injuries; for example, in 2025 he played only a few matches on the ATP Tour and has clearly been out of rhythm. He himself has acknowledged that his main goal now is to enjoy tennis and regain match sharpness rather than compete for titles or rankings.

Kovacevic, as a solid top-100 player, has had a much more regular and consistent 2025 season compared to Kyrgios, which is reflected in his higher ranking and superior competitive rhythm.

Head-to-head: 3 - 0 in 2025... 2-0 | 2-1 | 2-0

Tiffon has beaten Andreev once, while Andreev has never beaten him.
That match was won by Tiffon 6–2, 6–2.

Return points won: Andreev 34% (17/50), Tiffon 52% (27/52).
Aces: Andreev 1, Tiffon 3.

Tiffon was clearly superior in this matchup: he dominated both on return and on his second serve.
The biggest difference came on Andreev’s second serve, where he won only 30% of the points, compared to Tiffon’s 57%.

Tiffon has a better recent win percentage than Andreev.

Tiffon performs better on clay.

Albot has a very strong hard-court history over his career, but in 2025 his hard-court numbers are weak (15-12 Clarke vs 11-16 Albot), which offsets part of that experience.

both hover around a 60% win rate, with a slight edge for Clarke in overall ratio and good momentum this year.

Maestrelli has clearly progressed: he’s more complete, more consistent, and has a higher ranking.

Napolitano has also improved, but in a more irregular way: better than in 2022–23, but not on an upward trajectory as strong as Maestrelli’s.

info, double stake

H2H: Burruchaga 2 – Navone 1
Burruchaga is currently ranked No. 107 in the ATP rankings.
His win percentage over the last 52 weeks is around 63.6%.
His recent form is good, he feels comfortable on clay, and he could pull off an upset if Navone isn’t at 100%.
My opinion: The bet on Burruchaga at odds of 3.00 could have some value.

Rosenkranz comes into this matchup with a slight but clear edge. He already defeated Cassone in their only previous meeting, winning 6-0, 7-5, which gives him both tactical confidence and a psychological advantage. In that match, Rosenkranz dominated with his first serve, winning around 90% of his points behind it, while Cassone struggled to stay competitive on return.

Another key factor is how Rosenkranz handled the important moments. He converted most of his break-point chances, while Cassone failed to take advantage of the few opportunities he had. This shows that Rosenkranz tends to perform better under pressure when facing this opponent.

Considering how crucial this match is, I believe Alexander Zverev arrives in far better shape than Felix Auger, especially from a physical standpoint. Auger only secured his spot in the tournament at the very last moment and has been carrying the fatigue of several demanding weeks. His condition was so stretched that he skipped Metz—despite still having a chance to qualify—because he felt that without rest he would risk getting injured before Turin.

Against Sinner, it was clear in the second set that he was struggling physically, and his performance versus Ben Shelton did little to inspire confidence. He looks uncomfortable on court, is producing an unusual number of mistakes, and ultimately only managed to win thanks to an unfortunate fall from his opponent in the second set tie-break.

h2h: 8:4

Sasha Colleu has the advantage of entering the main draw as a wild card, which usually indicates that the tournament believes in his potential. However, he may have less experience on the Challenger Circuit or against more established players.

Taym Alazmeh has the advantage of having come through the qualifying rounds, which means he has already played in the tournament and may be “warmed up.” However, his ranking and previous results could suggest that he is not yet at the highest level of performance.

Overall, considering the surface, status, and lack of head-to-head history, I would estimate that Colleu has a slight edge for this match, without making Alazmeh’s victory improbable.

Vallejo has the edge due to his stronger recent form and ranking (around ATP #166 vs. Guillén Meza’s #213).
He’s won roughly 66% of his matches on clay, slightly higher than Guillén Meza’s 63%.
Vallejo also performs better on return games and maintains steadier first-serve percentages.
These stats make him the slight favorite on this surface.

Kyrian and Droguet have played each other 4 times and Kyrian has won all 4 matches. Droguet has only managed to win 1 set, while Kyrian has taken 10. Given these stats and the current form of both players, these odds look very high to me.

Baadi: He has had mixed results in 2025, with a win percentage around 42‑43%. This suggests that he may not be in his best form or that he shows some inconsistency.
Impact: Recent form slightly favors Kim.



This reflects that Kim has a slight edge mainly due to recent form and suitability to the indoor hard court, while Baadi’s experience partially offsets these factors.

Kolář win probability: ≈ 70 %

Aguilar Cardozo win probability: ≈ 30 %

Reasons behind this estimate

Kolar has extensive experience in professional tournaments and on clay, which gives him a clear edge. His record up to 2025 shows consistent play and solid results on this surface.

Aguilar Cardozo, although showing a good win percentage on clay (63.6%) for his level, has less experience at Challenger or ATP level and a smaller record in higher-tier events.

Based on the combination of experience, surface preference, and overall level, Kolář is a clear favorite. However, this doesn’t make an Aguilar Cardozo victory impossible — just less likely.